Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rain Robinson's avatar

Most commenters on the debate used "style" for Vance's plus side. I prefer the term "presentation". Style imparts a positive connotation, and there is NOTHING positive about Vance. Walz was not as forceful as he can be, that was a minus. But he sailed in substance. When picking a partner in life, style and presentation are not usually at the top of the list. Neither should they be for a veep.

Expand full comment
Stephen Geller's avatar

Where was the attack on Vance, until the last 5 minutes?

Walz should have begun by asking Vance to get on his knees and ask the citizens of Ohio whom he represents for forgiveness for lying about Haitians eating pets, and Vance's inability to face the consequences of Trump's attempted coup. If Vance could not get on his knees and ask for forgiveness, Walz should have said, "Why spent the rest of the hour and a half listening to a liar? I'm sure we all have more important things to do," and he should have left the pseudo-debate at once, leaving the camera on Vance's bizarre attempt at smiling.

Aren't we beyond civility with these criminals?

Expand full comment

No posts